This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Hatnotes should not be used for articles that do not exist since the notes are intended to point the user to another article they may have intended to find. The exception is if one intends to create the linked article immediately. In that case, consider creating the new article first, before saving the addition of the hatnote.
I don't see why hatnotes to the actual butterfly articles could not be used, since the genus is usually included in the scientific names. However, as I do not understand the specifics of Nomenclature Codes, I did not try to write a hatnote myself, lest I incure the rath of the "experts".
Condescending and antagonistic notes/summaries such as "If you do not understand what "codes of nomenclature" are, do not even *think* about removing the redlinks, OK?" are not very conducive to cooperative editng. Futher such notes will be treated as uncivil. and reported in the apporpriate place. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just removed a large section, which was mostly taken from the Alena homepage (i.e.). Furthermore the removed text was unbearable marketing bladder-dash. --noclador (talk) 06:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
