Talk:Alcabala

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Latin America: Venezuela Mid‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Venezuela portal This article is supported by WikiProject Venezuela (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Alcabala appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that resentment of the sales tax called the alcabala triggered several revolts in Spain's colonies, even though rates there were lower than in Spain itself?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/March.

Wikipedia

Missing Spain itself! edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Contrary to what the article says at the moment, this was one of the most important taxes in Spain itself. It was not imposed only on the Dutch & in the colonies. I'm about to start reworking it accordingly. I'll assume that what is here is accurate as far as it goes. - Jmabel | Talk 20:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

1341 or 1342? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In one section it says the tax began in 1342 but later on it says what the rate was in 1341, implying the tax is even older than this. The history section should maybe be moved above the Significance and Rates section to clarify why these dates are used. Rosswagner1985 (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic