This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Papua New Guinea, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Papua New Guinea on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Papua New GuineaWikipedia:WikiProject Papua New GuineaTemplate:WikiProject Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Alexandermcnabb hi again, and thanks for your work at NPP (I think). The Canadaland podcast on mining provides significant coverage, I think that alone could be used to justify notability, of course lots of other independent coverage. I wanted to check if you would agree to remove the tag in that context. I did add some stuff since the tag, although it's not a major change, more details and passing mentions. CT55555 (talk) 01:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hey. Oh but me oh my that was a damning (I think) there! ;) I have no objection to removing the tag - as I said elsewhere, I consider it a request for eyes not a judgement per se. I didn't realise you were the author; I was concerned at a very local entity with a very direct focus and at the objectivity of some of the sources - and at passing mentions/quotes in pieces (bearing in mind "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - I have no involvement in or knowledge of mining in PNG and really don't have the time or inclination for a 'deep dive' but activist journalism worries me a little as sourcing. There's clearly no concern grave enough to warrant a veer away to AfD, but I did feel it worth flagging a concern. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is true that the source is activist journalism. I think the sources deal with the subject and issues fairly, but that is open to critique. Maybe I'll leave the tag up for now for those extra eyes and I'll revisit the article a few times myself. Thanks. All the best. CT55555 (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
