This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Airspeed Ltd. is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Far be it from me to disagree with the great Norway, but a 250 hp engine in the 1930s is supposed to be a great loss of some sort? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
The aircraft design had already occurred and if a different AM compliant engine was needed at a higher cost then it's a financial loss for Airspeed.GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Airspeed Ltd./Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
Requires infobox Done
Requires photographs
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
