 | Ainulindalë has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 19, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contradiction edit
The lead says that Tolkien started writing it in 1919, down in the article it says 1918. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 17:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Italics edit
@Chiswick Chap: The work may have ended up as a chapter in The Silmarillion as published by Christopher Tolkein, but as written by JRR Tolkein it was a separate manuscript. In a letter to Katherine Farrer concerning manuscripts he sent her for review he wrote "I have ventured to include besides the 'Silmarillion' or main chronicle, one or two other connected 'myths': 'The Music of the Ainur', ...". But whatever, I was merely making the title conform to the lead sentence which italicises it. SpinningSpark 10:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hm, yes, but Tolkien wrote many hundreds of manuscripts; the nearest comparison would be books of short stories, where each one is a separate manuscript and could indeed be a published work, say in a newspaper or magazine, but we treat the stories as un-italicised parts of a book all the same. However, the italics do make sense for Quenya, as I already said in the edit comment, so I pointedly didn't revert you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ainulindalë/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 14:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
No images to review. The Grey Book citation seems less than ideal, but per this page it's peer-reviewed, even if some of the material is submitted by undergraduates. The author appears to be a physics undergrad in this case. The material quoted is straightforward interpretation; I'm not sure this would survive at FAC, though. Sources are otherwise reliable and Earwig finds nothing but a few backward copied sentences.
- Noted.
- 'Marjorie Burns, who worked on the different versions of the "Ainulindalë"': what does "worked on" mean? I think "studied" would be better if that's the intended meaning.
- Fixed.
- Suggest combining the last two paras to avoid having one-sentence paragraphs.
-- That's everything. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Fixes look good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)