 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation edit
Any chance of getting someone to polish the translation? Queenmomcat (talk) 19:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Does it even all need to be there?Dreambeaver (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- We definitely need an expert eye to look over this article.--Soulparadox 13:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
copyedit fail edit
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, lfstevens, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on September 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
The first section doesn't even mention the country where the inscriptions are found. I couldn't figure out who was making which inscription. An expert needs to intervene. Lfstevens (talk) 19:56, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aihole inscriptions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090204151016/http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/docs/HISTORY/primarydocs/Epigraphy/AiholeInscription.htm to http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/docs/HISTORY/primarydocs/Epigraphy/AiholeInscription.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Redirect? edit
@RegentsPark: This is an important inscription found at a Jain temple in Aihole, one that has been re-edited / republished several times / questioned / re-translated / debated. It is notable, cited and debated in different contexts including those of the Chalukyas, and more generally for South Indian history. You redirected a version of this article. I agree, it was weak/meaningless, based on non-RS, and that did not deserve to exist as an independent article. I would like to expand and rewrite it, based on peer reviewed scholarship and the debate therein. Before I do, please let me know if you have additional concerns, suggestions and other reasons to keep the redirect to Aihole article? The redirected article is about Aihole and even more so, the monuments in Aihole. The short para we have on Aihole inscription (Aihole prasasthi) there is weak and it misleads. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 20:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: I don't really remember why I did that (perhaps someone had requested it?) but, of course, if you can make it into an article, go ahead. --RegentsPark (comment) 20:26, 30 August 2021 (UTC)