This article has developed significant issues with citation overkill and references that, themselves, contain strings of sources in a bullet point format. Much of the bullet point content in the references appears to constitute original research with a very heavy dependence upon case law (a primary source).
The net effect of the bullet pointed references is to render the reference section very difficult to parse and I suspect has the overall effect of obscuring the sourcing for the article rather than directing users to reliable sources cited in support of the article's content. There is also content within the references that appears to be better placed in footnotes. Arllaw (talk) 15:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
