Talk:Age of Anger

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Age of Anger article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Globalization Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit/Rv in reception section edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Kapsig10: I reverted your edit for three reasons I outlined in my edit summary. When you re-did the edit, I saw only one of the three addressed in your summary. Your edit still created a sentence fragment with stray markup in the article, and it still left some of the Slate stuff in, while removing things that didn't come from Slate. Both of these seem like mistakes even if Slate is not reliable.
Furthermore, Slate *is* a reliable source according to WP:RSN, as I stated. A source's reliability is not determined by sitejabber, yelp, or any other place online; it is determined by on-wiki consensus using a variety of different types of evidence. In my edit summary, citing RSN was referencing that consensus.--MattMauler (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic