Talk:After the Empire

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on After the Empire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518081626/http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0401.0401.html to http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0401.0401.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

I restored deleted references

Deleted by 13 May 2010 DBaba:

• "[Todd] has written what may be the most important work since Francis Fukuyama's The End of History and the Last Man (1992)"
• "Emmanuel Todd's After the Empire has been a bestseller in France for most of the last year--which should tell you a lot about the book even before you read the first page. In substance and rune, Todd's writing bears a strong resemblance to that of conservative intellectuals, like Robert Kagan, who proclaim the inevitability of American dominance. But Todd's thesis is the exact opposite of the neocons'...Like the neocons' worldview, Todd's theory combines a wishful vision of the future and nationalistic triumphalism in a way that sidesteps the facts...We and our allies are, in a word, interdependent. That may sound dull and "interdependence" won't sell many books. But unlike the theories of Todd and the neocons, it happens to he true." <ref name = "wm">Kirshner, Alexander (2004). "Eiffel cower: France's answer to the neocons". Washington Monthly. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Moscowamerican (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

References