| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aeromarine AS article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
merge proposal edit
Two articles for the same aircraft=merge time.Petebutt (talk) 16:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Good catch. There wasn't a link to the Aeromarine page, and nothing popped up on the search for Aeromarine A.S. before I started the other article. The Skyways article had quite a few references to the model name as Aeromarine A.S.-1 & A.S.-2, A google search lists several web intances as just Aeromarine AS. Which one should be the main? Thoughts? FlugKerl (talk) 18:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- They are United States Navy designations so this (Aeromarine AS) would be the correct article title. One AS-1 and two AS-2s were built under the naval "AS" designation. MilborneOne (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)