This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
In this edit the primary units were switched to metric without discussion. It is a Lockheed (American) design, the F-104S flight manual dimensions and performance figures are all feet, inches, knots and miles. This change should be reverted, taking the opportunity to remove the myriad unsourced details in the specs section. Nimbus(Cumulusnimbusfloats by) 18:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Since it's a licensed production, I've no issue with using metric here. I think that's standard practice in most such articles, but I haven't surveyed it to be certain. I wholeheartedly support removing the myriad unsourced spec details. BilCat (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Given that most of the cn tags were added by the editor who added the data in question, in the same edit...Nigel Ish (talk) 18:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply