Talk:Advertiser-funded programming

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 161.253.70.234 in topic poorly written, no sources

Copyright edit

This looks like a copyright violation, but I couldn't find it through Google. If it isn't, it needs a lot of cleanup. -- Kjkolb 13:23, 27 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Original/unverified research edit

This article has no sources and as kjkolb said, appears to be original research. Added {{Original research}} tag -- Toveling 02:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Claims against C4, ITV and Flextech edit

IIUC Advertiser Funded programming (distinct from traditional sponsorship) is illegal in the UK? Pit-yacker 15:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Advertiser-funded programming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Advertiser-funded programming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

poorly written, no sources edit

This whole article reads like a cooy-pasted high-school essay; doesn't fit the tone of Wikipedia whatsoever. Plus, there's no sources. This article should be deleted or have a large notice. 161.253.70.234 (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply