Talk:Adorn (song)

Single cover

Is the one on here actually official? It claims lescharts.com as its reference, which in turn claims the cover is (presumably) from a digital promo. Is lescharts.com (or any of the other Hung Medien sites) actually reliable for official artwork? As far as I can tell, the single cover here is just two still-frames from the beginning of the (second) music video shoddily shopped together. As the article already correctly points out, the song wasn't released as a standalone digital single (unless you count the remix); it was first available on the mixtape and originally available for purchase through the preview EP.Mmrsofgreen (talk) 01:17, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Genre

Diff in question; The SoulBounce.com writer's rhetoric of "electro soul slice of niceness" doesnt support electro and soul as genres here. "Electro soul", what the writer uses, is not a genre, but an anachronism, as soul music is rooted musically in gospel, not any electronic music style; contemporary R&B is however, and the Allmusic source I cited supports the genre here being "R&B". This wasnt an unexplained change (check the edit history, 21:08, 20 October 2012‎) Dan56 (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

This is no anachronism. If you look on the electro page, you can even see them mention electro soul. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.181.126 (talk) 05:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for responding. Dan56 (talk) 05:54, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

You made your point, yet this revision doesnt make sense, according to you pointing out "electro-soul", along with the other changes. Dan56 (talk) 06:00, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Music Video

Can someone get an explanation of the music video? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.238.244.243 (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Adorn (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thefader.com/2012/11/16/miguel-second-wind/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://consequenceofsound.net/2012/10/album-review-miguel-kaleidoscope-dream/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allmusic.com/album/kaleidoscope-dream-mw0002413681
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spin.com/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/164313-miguel-kaleidoscope-dream/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/kaleidoscope-dream-20121005
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://abcnewsradioonline.com/music-news/2013/1/21/miguel-talks-about-kaleidoscope-dreams-sex-driven-moments.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130424132118/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121014143950/http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/reverb/2012/10/nice_hits_is_a_reverb_17.php to http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/reverb/2012/10/nice_hits_is_a_reverb_17.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://social.entertainment.msn.com/music/blogs/expert-witness-blogpost.aspx?post=4ae4a71f-e229-44a9-ae0d-5f3bf53cc93b
• Added archive https://archive.is/20121030110842/http://www.ariacharts.com.au/news/33225/chartifacts to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/news/33225/chartifacts

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)