Talk:Adentro

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleAdentro has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 22, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 26, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that on his tenth album, Adentro, Ricardo Arjona included a song in which the lyrical content relates to a woman's menstruation?

Fair use rationale for Image:RicardoArjona-Adentro.jpg edit

 

Image:RicardoArjona-Adentro.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adentro/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Robin (talk · contribs) 12:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Refs
Lead
  • Delink Adentro tour as it doesn't have an article.
    •   Done
Recording
  • On an interview -- In which interview?
    •   Done
  • I re-titled this section because the sub-section wasn't needed (too small) and included more background information than compositional information.
  • These sentences - The song received negative response due to its theme, on which the singer commented that the song had "the most beautiful lyrics from Adentro,"[7][8] further stating that "more than hitting me, they [the criticism] saddens me."[8] He also stated that "criticism is a symptom of envy. - Lack clarity and seem to be translated from Spanish. I suggest removing it completely or re-structure the sentencing and move it to the critical reception section, where it belongs.
    •   Done.
Tour and Fundacion Adentro
  • The foundation, as stated, doesn't have anything to do with the album except for sharing the same name. Remove.
    •   Not done, the foundation, as stated, is named after the album.
  • I think this section should be merged with the singles' section, to give the article more body.
    •   Done
Commercial performance
  • the album became Arjona's third album to do so -- do what?
    •   Done, I believe he was hinting at being certified in Argentina.
Critical reception
  • Too many quotes - try writing most of them in your own words.
    •   Done
  • Delink AllMusic as it is linked in the recording section.
    •   Done


On hold. — Robin (talk) 13:55, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

All done! — DivaKnockouts 20:24, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I gave the article one last copy-edit. — Robin (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
By the way, this is very thoughtful of you, DivaKnockouts! — Robin (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Passing. — Robin (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that Robin! Regards. — DivaKnockouts 18:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Adentro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adentro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply