Talk:Adaptive step size

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Jftsang in topic 'How to content'

Should the paper by Ilie et al be cited? edit

The article by Ilie at al is controversial, see the paper by E Novak and H Wozniakowski (two respected researchers in numerical analysis) on arxiv: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0904.4441

Szepi (talk) 06:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

'How to content' edit

There was a notice dating from 2009 that this article contained 'how to' content (contrary to WP:NOTHOWTO). This is true, but I have removed the template because I don't think this is a problem for the article. For articles such as this one on mathematical methods, a 'how to' may be the best way to illustrate the method being talked about. Of course, there should be discussion about other aspects of the method as well -- who came up with it, when it is used, and so on. --jftsang 16:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Adaptive step size/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

A bit chatty. Far more can be added; the method with halving the step size is rarely used. Implementation details: various safety factors, PI control. Examples showing the importance of variable step size. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 13:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:43, 5 May 2016 (UTC)