Talk:Adams Company

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Banjohunter in topic proposal to split page

proposal to split page edit

There is a lot more to say about Adams manufacturing, a very successful and long-running American manufacturing company. It seems that the current page should be about the automobile that they made briefly, and there should be another page about the company that does and did so much more than make that line of cars.

Banjohunter (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

See also section edit

Just so someone doesn't repeat my mistake of removing them, the redlinks Bailey, Balzer, and Intrepid are here because they all used Rotary engines at some point. HornColumbia (talk) 03:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adams-Farwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply