Talk:Adam Powers, The Juggler

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

The same Ken Rosenthal? edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article cites real-life juggler Ken Rosenthal as an inspiration. The link is to a sportswriter entry which says nothing about juggling of that Ken Rosenthal and the citation supplied, from at least a cursory glance, appears not to name the real-life juggler nor attach the memory of the real juggler of inspiration to the sportswriter at the link. Vapourmile (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Importance edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this is important enough. Good reference material on old computer graphics, especially graphics which didn't reach consumer attention is rare, but that makes it no less historically important nor less worthy of recording. I recommend Wikipedia pride itself on recording poorly documented histories, especially those which are poorly recorded largely because they didn't attain widespread public attention. Vapourmile (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic