Talk:Acting (law)

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Acting (law) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ambiguities? edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This might be too in the weeds, but it seems to me that there are at least two distinct meanings of 'acting' in the legal context.

Temporary actings, who are serving in someone else's place; and
Agents, who are acting – potentially on an indefinite basis – on behalf of someone else.

Should we address both in this article? At the moment, only the first meaning seems prominent. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Added the relevant hatnote; not sure if more might be required. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I think the hatnote is a fine resolution. The agency sense would never be found outside of a phrase indicating that the subject was acting on behalf of another. BD2412 T 15:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Interim" or "Interrex"? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

At the section "See also" in the article, it is probably better to mention the term "Interrex" instead of "Interim". -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic