A fact from Acquired homosexuality appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that belief that homosexuality can be acquired has motivated Nazi persecution, discriminatory age-of-consent laws, censorship of LGBT publications and employment discrimination?
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that belief that homosexuality can be acquired has motivated Nazi persecution, discriminatory age of consent laws, censorship of LGBT publications and employment discrimination? Source: various, see article
Overall: Looks good, article meets the requirements, information present in the hook is cited through references found in the article, and I agree that the main hook is more effective than the ALT1. I see no reason to not approve. JJonahJackalope (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The article immediately goes ahead, as required by our guidelines, to say that acquired homosexuality "is [a] discredited idea". Given the emphasis, I don't know what exactly to expect but I certainly didn't expect the "Scientific evidence" section to be that scanty or have only one source citation. Anyone wanna expand it? More sources? — Python Drink (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
To be more specific, I'm very much interested in seeing scientific evidence that points to homosexuality being innate. I actually want to show this to people so I want more sources and expansion. — Python Drink (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Python Drink A good place to start in expanding the article could be the sources cited by Bailey et al. Or, you could try posting on WT:MED and do your own searches. We also have articles on Environment and sexual orientation and biology and sexual orientation which may have additional useful resources. However, most medical researchers don't frame their questions primarily in terms of "innate" vs. "not innate" meaning that studies can't be cited in this article without WP:original research. (t · c) buidhe 19:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Looks good, article meets the requirements, information present in the hook is cited through references found in the article, and I agree that the main hook is more effective than the ALT1. I see no reason to not approve. JJonahJackalope (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)