Talk:Abstract management
 | The contents of the Conference management system page were merged into Abstract management on 20 January 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives
| |
|
July 2009 edit
- I've removed edits by User:Jj4375 yet again, for the following reasons:
- The aim seems to be to promote a software vendor. Jj4375 commented on my talk page that "If you are willing to allow advertisements to be linked from this page as such, please provide a specification that indicates how I might post an identically formatted advertisement for our organization... For competitive fairness you cannot allow a single vendor to represent a concept as broad as abstract management". I note that this user is a single purpose account with no edit history other than this article (Special:Contributions/Jj4375).
- There are in any case no advertisements in the article. Jj4375 objects to the link to Elsevier. It's an arguable point. When I added the link a couple of years ago it was the best illustration I could find and I'm pretty sure it satisfies WP:EL but I'm happy to debate the point on this page.
- Even if it hadn't clearly been intended as a spamlink, the link provided by Jj4375 fails WP:EL because it's a page that's intended primarily to sell a product or service.
- The text added by Jj4375 does not provide a useful addition to the article but merely provides a context for the link.
Merge from Conference management system edit
A merge was proposed by an editor in January 2015 but a discussion was never created. I think the merge is a good idea and it has sat untouched for a year. So I am going to perform the merge now. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Page move edit
"Conference paper management" isn't a term that you'll normally find in the industry. It's usually "abstract management" and sometimes "paper management". That's all. Andyjsmith (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Abstract management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071121215026/http://www.mpiweb.org/CMS/mpiweb/mpicontent.aspx?id=7404 to http://www.mpiweb.org/CMS/mpiweb/mpicontent.aspx?id=7404
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)