Talk:Aaron Callaghan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by EchidnaLives in topic Requested move 6 March 2023


Untitled edit

Aaron curently works as a coach at UCD in dublin, and has two daughters, Chloe Callaghan, born in 1995, and Amy Callaghan, born in 2002 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.255.21 (talk) 21:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aaron Callaghan (footballer, born 1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aaron Callaghan (footballer, born 1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 March 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. per WP:TRAINWRECK. However, participants agreed that most of these would be uncontroversial moves as unnecessary disambiguations (except for a few brought up here) and I would recommend the nominator or others moved these themselves per WP:BOLD, or start individual discussions. Thanks. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 02:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


– As primary topics; current titles are occupied by dab pages whose only link are to the article I propose moving. If moved, the dab pages should be deleted as WP:G14. I don't expect this to be controversial, but I am opening an RM in case a naming convention that I am unaware of requires parenthetical disambiguation for any of these articles so that such articles can be identified and excluded. BilledMammal (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisted. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 15:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I support most of these moves. I note that the DAB page for Alpha Kappa Pi should probably stay, as it had neglected to show this second use of those Greek letters, for an article that hadn't survived an earlier AfD vote. I've updated the DAB page list. That group, Alfa Kappa Pi nevertheless exists, thus the DAB ensures the matter is not confused vis-a-vis Alpha Kappa Pi (fraternity). Jax MN (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't think Arctic Rose (album) is notable enough to be DIFFCAPped from Arctic rose. 162 etc. (talk) 16:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Good point. Removed; I've redirected Arctic Rose to Rhodiola rosea and added a hatnote. BilledMammal (talk) 17:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oppose Joe Gomez (footballer)Joseph Gomez per WP:COMMONNAME. Either redirect Joseph Gomez to the footballer, or to the dab page Joe Gomez. Tassedethe (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think natural disambiguation would be appropriate there. BilledMammal (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
But that would require evidence that he is known as Joseph, per "...an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources...". And I don't see evidence that he is known as Joseph, certainly not in the references in the article. Tassedethe (talk) 00:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Generally support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Presume the lack of accent on target Tomás Molina was a mistake? In ictu oculi (talk)
  • Oppose. This appears to be in the same batch as Talk:Alakol, Azerbaijan#Requested move 6 March 2023, which is a WP:TRAINWRECK: see there for the context (some of the dab pages had a single entry because they had been vandalised, some lacked entries that they should have had, some had more entries that didn't get caught by the nom's (automated?) process, while a few of the proposed moves involved changing the title to an obscure alternative name without any apparent justification). The current RM appears a bit less messy, but still: I've looked at a sample of 7 moves above, 4 looked alright, but 3 were clear fails (the ones involving the dabs Maamigili and KPSU, where I've restored the other links, and Los Rosales, which I've expanded). – Uanfala (talk) 11:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 19:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Procedural oppose - what a clusterfuck. Close and re-nominate individually, if you cannot be BOLD and move articles without it. GiantSnowman 19:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Procedural oppose per GiantSnowman. Most of these are fine to just do unilaterally per WP:BOLD, but we do not want to give these moves the aura of consensus since we're not going to sit here and review every single one of them individually to make sure it is appropriate. -- King of ♥ 04:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
    • if I understood correctly, you would support a close of “Moved without consensus, any objection with a reasonable time frame should result in the move being reverted”? I agree with, and would prefer, such a close - they’re listed here for review, not to obtain consensus. BilledMammal (talk) 04:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Strongest possible support per nom. - Tbf69 🛈 🗩 17:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Procedural oppose per WP:TRAINWRECK. Nardog (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: It's flooding the possibly incomplete section of WP:RM, any way to fix that? Sennecaster (Chat) 03:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
    That is interesting; it seems to make the usually safe assumption that target pages will be kept. BilledMammal (talk) 04:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
It (the RMCD bot) always makes that call when new target titles are pages with any kind of content (not red links nor redirects). To fix it, just add dispositions for all those target pages, such as Steve Cruz → deleted to make way for page move. Of course, they'll all have to be included in the Requested move/dated template as well. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 20:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support everything that wasn't explicitly objected to above. Counter everyone else I don't seem the problem with making mass requested moves to establish a convention, and have done so several times before. In all cases, the objections to specific entries do not change the fact that the state after this move is preferable to the state before it, even if a third case-specific state would be even more preferable. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nomination. These are definitely examples of "{R from unnecessary disambiguation}". —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 07:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Unnecessary disambiguation. But keep Joe Gomez where he is. Can’t find support for Joseph in RS. —В²C 08:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support as unnecessary disambiguations, though I strongly agree with @GiantSnowman that most of these can just be moved as BOLD edits; really only discuss if the move is reverted. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 06:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment This is almost a WP:TRAINWRECK. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Relist note: not quite seeing a consensus here. Happy garnering! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 15:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Procedural oppose per WP:TRAINWRECK. 〜Festucalextalkcontribs 15:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Split opinion from me:
    • Supporting all page moves whose disambiguation pages have just the one entry such as Aaron Callaghan, Aaron Lawrence ect.
    • Opposing page moves to target page names whose disambiguation have two or more entries such as Maamigili as well as Joe Gomez (footballer) for reasons above.
    • Comment Unsure why Chris Breen is a redirect to Chris Breen (ice hockey), the only person with that name on Wikipedia.
    • Note to closer: as I have seen situations like this before, the pages ended up not being moved (example here), I think the same result could occur here as well, definite trainwreck based on my split view. Thanks -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iggy the Swan (talkcontribs) 18:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support in principle but several require separate discussions, namely: Alfonso Carvajal, Alpha Kappa Pi, Howard Klein, KPSU, Maamigili and Los Rosales—blindlynx 22:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.