This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion
What exactly is the plot of this novel? It should be mentioned in the article. --96.240.61.34 (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Not like it matters anymore =(, since the wiki is no longer active. A great idea that suffered from poor execution . . . . --200.59.188.242 (talk) 20:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
It should still be mentioned, even if the project is inactive. However, the link to the site provided here does not work, and the site itself is probably dead.-Zyrath (talk) 22:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I added a statement that no cohesive plot or narrative developed. Lijil (talk) 11:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Under the "reception" heading I added another positive viewpoint referenced in the research report to further enforce a neutral stance in the article. 2601:1C2:4580:FAB0:E953:7EE8:D520:7825 (talk) 02:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
