Untitled edit

Dude it is cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.95.228.14 (talk) 15:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The plot summary in this article is very brief, and claims that the book starts at a point that is actually about two-thirds of the way into the book. It'd be cool to see a more thorough plot summary on here. Anthonyjosephdavid (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2019 and 10 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anz Petz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Plot Summary edit

The plot summary needs a lot of work done on it, I havn't even read past the sixth chapter yet and I already noticed a lot of mistakes, can someone who has read the book fix it? c.m1994 (talk to me, if you dare.) 21:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have not been back to reread the book after my first time. That was a pivotal experience for me. The book's organization and content are great and don't dwell on the sensational, contrary to what one poster says. Read in the context of every boy, whether he becomes a child soldier or something else, it's a gratifying example of males treated with real respect-something not common anywhere, including in the United States (compare the mandatory Selective Service registration). The lengths to which others went to salvage Beah are uncommon but should be the norm. For example, if we were to regularly apply such an approach to young boys--like my grandsons--we would dramatically reduce the number of suicides among boys and young men by dealing with them as individuals rather than as functions of where they are in the social fabric. As it is we indoctrinate males,through the media and elsewhere, from an early age to accept suicide as an appropriate alternative.Godofredo29 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:59, 17 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Obvious Mistakes edit

After reviewing the plot, I had also noticed a lot of major mistakes. Not only is it inaccurate, but it has no formatting, and has the writing style of an average 6th grader. "They learned a couple songs and are going to perform in a contest" is the line which immediately tipped me off that this NEEDS to be fixed. It also uses the acronym RUF throughout the summary, but never states what it is. I will definately come back and fix this up when I have the time. Ohelig (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Long Way Gone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply