Talk:ARM Cortex-A8
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
WikiProject RISC OS edit
| WikiProject RISC OS topic coordination | We're attempting to coordinate a few pages together, including RISC OS and ARM Cortex-A8. Feel free to discuss this at Talk:RISC OS. |
Samsung edit
Does the A8 in the new Google Nexus S (Samsung) represent another implementation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.96.183.128 (talk) 13:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
References edit
There are some potential references on the TI wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trevj (talk • contribs) 08:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Requesting Input edit
The popularity of the Cortex M0 and M4 are starting to take off, thus it would be easier to pick some direction before having a bunch of tiny articles. Should there be unique articles for each of the ARM Cortex families? Should there be only 3 major ARM Cortex articles instead, and redirect all sub-flavors to these 3 new articles? Requesting input at Talk:List of ARM microprocessor cores#Discusion for ARM Cortex article overhaul for comments! • Sbmeirow • Talk • 17:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
NEON optional for A8?? edit
This article says so, but the text on NEON at ARM_architecture#Advanced SIMD (NEON) disagrees: "NEON is included in all Cortex-A8 devices but is optional in Cortex-A9 devices." The Cortex-A8 Technical Reference Manual in the section 1.3. Components of the processor lists NEON as a component with no mention of optionality. Similarly, the first few results of a search for 'Cortex A8 NEON optional' don't support optionality. I'm not expert enough to resolve this but I've marked the questionable text. 146.90.101.214 (talk) 12:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on ARM Cortex-A8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150101062932/http://www.arm.com/files/pdf/A8_Paper.pdf to http://www.arm.com/files/pdf/A8_Paper.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111105004637/http://www.rock-chips.com/index.php?do=prodnew to http://www.rock-chips.com/index.php?do=prodnew
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121119093431/http://www.conexant.com/servlets/DownloadNewsServlet/03282011-1.pdf to http://www.conexant.com/servlets/DownloadNewsServlet/03282011-1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)