Talk:A3 (Croatia)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk) 17:43, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):     c (OR):  
    Trusting all the Croatian articles are RS and state what is in the article here .Ref 8 should use {{google maps}} instead of {{cite map}}. All PDF files should have "}} b (citations to reliable sources)'
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Suggest adding in the commons images captions in both English and Croatian. Some have one, some have both.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Passing with just the few small changes that need to be made. Good job.