Talk:8th Field Survey Squadron

Military history: Technology / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal 8th Field Survey Squadron is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Suggestions edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

G'day, Peter, thank you for putting this article together. Very detailed. I can see you have put a lot of hard work into it. I have a minor concern about the use of "personal notes", though. I realise that you have a wealth of experience with this topic, given your background, but this is to be avoided per the site's policy about original research. Is there another source that you could use instead of your own notes? For instance, a book, journal article or newspaper article, or website? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic