Talk:85 mm divisional gun D-44

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Why is this gun compared to the 25 Pounder field gun? edit

Dear wikieditors, I'm not clear why in the comparison table in this article the 25 pounder field gun/howitzer was included. It is a very different type of gun, and as such it might be better to include a british antitank gun like the 17 pounder. Please consider this suggestion. Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 06:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The 85-mm D-48 was a purpose built antitank gun but the D-44 was more of a general purpose weapon. As the bore diameter of the 25-Pounder was about 87-mm, it was included as a comparable field artillery piece in the table. Cheers, W. B. Wilson (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 85 mm divisional gun D-44. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply