Talk:50 metres

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 120.16.100.193 in topic Manfred Kokots alleged time of 5.61 is false

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 50 metres. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Manfred Kokots alleged time of 5.61 is false edit

Hi. Manfred Kokots 5.61 is false & needs to be removed from the list. His actual time was 5.84! (I kid you not! [in a heat, equalled in the final when coming 2nd] on the same day), which was far from a world record. The 5.61 was falsely reported by the media at the time & was never questioned. There are articles about it & I will find them for you (even an interview with Kokot himself where he tells of the innacuracy). The 5.61 he allegedly ran then became legendary & was never scrutinised. Everywhere you look it tells of the 5.61, but this is incorrect! 120.16.100.193 (talk) 03:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply