Talk:4-Nitrochlorobenzene

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Areas to look into edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The images are not named meaningfully. Would be good for you to choose meaningful names and upload them again. Perhaps you can take a look at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(chemistry)/Structure_drawing to find out about our community's best practices. A few specific criticisms would be:

Images
- the serif font you use in the reaction arrow for the first two images is very jarring in contrast to the sans serif fonts used for Br, NO2, etc. as well as the sans serif fonts used in the last image.
- the image width you have chosen is excessive for such a small image.
- the + sign and the reaction arrow is out of proportion to the benzene rings in the last image.
References
- You will also need a stronger reference than a patent, to support the description of industrial production. What does Ullmann's say?
Wikilinking
- Keywords should be wikilinked as appropriate.

Appreciate it if you look into these points. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 13:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic