Talk:28 Days (album)

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Shaidar cuebiyar in topic Assessment comment

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:28 Days (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  N A lead section giving an overview of the album
  •  Y A track listing
  •  N Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C-class:

  •  N All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel
  •  N Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims
  •  N A casual reader should learn something about the album

B-class:

  •  N All the C-class criteria
  •  N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
  •  N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
  •  N No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia"
Evaluation based on WikiProject Albums assessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Last reviewed by – Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 21:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)