Talk:22 nm process

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled edit

The 22 nm node is expected to be a significantly different technology from today's 65 nm and older technologies. Thus the path to 22 nm will be revolutionary ~~evolutionary~~ rather than evolutionary ~~revolutionary~~.

This conclusion seem wrong to me. It makes much more sense, according to the preceding argumentation, if the two words were the other way around, as my correction suggests (original is striked-through text).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hynix mass produces 20nm NAND chips

Hynix's new 20nm NAND chips are scheduled to become available in September 2010

http://www.thinq.co.uk/2010/8/9/hynix-mass-produces-20nm-nand-chips/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.9.237.88 (talk) 09:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

What about the recently announced 28nm from IBM? 121.73.130.22 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Applied Materials' new 22nm logic gates edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How significant is AMAT's new logic gate technology? Is this evolutionary or revolutionary? TheLastWordSword (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Moore's Law Disturbed? edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since Moore's law is still relevant and 14 nanometer technology was introduced the following line should be removed.

"This is an indication that CMOS scaling in this area has reached a wall at this point, possibly disturbing Moore's law." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.200.70.2 (talk) 07:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic