Talk:21 July 2005 London bombings

Explosions

The article says that the explosions were caused by detonator caps. But the standard method of detonation is electrical. Is there any specific reference to caps ? It was reported that the explosions were caused by the detonators, I suggest that the most likely explanation is an electrical fuse, could be a bit of fuse wire or a low voltage bulb broken open, or a photographic flashbulb broken open, with semtex filaments carrying the fire throughout the body of the charge. The article should not be more specific than what is certain. Reg nim (talk) 00:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

nc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.255.47.120 (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

"terrorist attack"

Per WP:Avoid the words "terrorist" and "terrorism" should be avoided. This guideline is inconsistently followed, and is less likely to be followed on pages documenting attacks on or in Western countries than on or in 3rd World or non-NATO countries. This amounts to Systemic bias. This page is a prominent example of the use of these words when they could be avoided.

The article currently says "It was immediately apparent that the explosions were the result of a terrorist attack..." I propose replacing "terrorist" with "intentional". It changes the meaning of the sentence only slightly--by being more specific if anything.

I am discussing this rather than simply changing the word because I have attempted to remove all references to "terrorist" and "terrorism" from the article once already (in the process making the unfortunate and embarrassing choice to use the word "extremist"--also part of the guideline). This particular instance of the word was reverted. However, I still think the article would be better off without it, and I would like to change it with consensus. Revcasy (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://itn.co.uk/news/3967b7a45c8a1847f5ba6d060069a0ec.html
  • In 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot on 2011-05-26 02:25:19, 404 Not Found
  • In 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot on 2011-06-14 22:27:34, 404 Not Found
  • In 21 July 2005 London bombings on 2011-06-19 05:25:16, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 21 July 2005 London bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13397188,00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1702712,00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1189833,00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1189920,00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.theguardian.com/attackonlondon/story/0,16132,1538935,00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070121135832/http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2162851.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2162851.ece
• Added archive https://archive.is/20070611154745/http://www.pmo.gov.uk/output/Page7969.asp to http://www.pmo.gov.uk/output/Page7969.asp
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://cms.met.police.uk/news/major_operational_announcements/terrorist_attacks/london_incidents_21_july

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 21 July 2005 London bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5v7oxzBQu?url=http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13397188,00.html to http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13397188,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

"Islamic terrorism"

Whoever keeps adding the words "islamic terrorism" and related templates to the article, should better find reliable sources for this. As it stands now, the perpetrators were found guilty of an "intention to murder" and not of terrorism. The article, based on sources, also makes it clear that the motive behind the attack was "revenge" and not religion (i.e., a sense of a religious obligation). Will be removing these POV templates added fairly recently. — kashmīrī ^TALK 08:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)