Talk:2024 United States Senate election in Florida

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 October 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too soon? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Arizona, California, Nebraska, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia all have their pages open but it's "Too soon" for Florida despite the incumbent declaring for Reelection just like in Nebraska, Ohio, and West Virginia! It's bull! Dickeyaustin786 (talk) 12:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Description of Alan Grayson edit

Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I think it is appropriate to call Grayson a perennial candidate. He has now had 5 failed campaigns in a row (FL-Sen 2016, FL-9 2018, FL-6 2020, FL-Sen 2022, FL-10 2022). He has not won an election (or even come close) since 2014. Every 2 years since then, he has launched at least one failed campaign. The definition of a perennial candidate is "a political candidate who frequently runs for elected office and rarely, if ever, wins." The fact that he was elected to office at one point doesn't negate the fact that he is currently a perennial candidate. For example, Robin Ficker is currently described as "Robin Ficker, former state delegate (1979–1983) and perennial candidate." At this point, it's a choice between two descriptions:

Alan Grayson, former U.S. Representative from Florida's 9th congressional district (2009–2011, 2013–2017), candidate for U.S. Senate in 2016 and 2022, candidate for Florida's 9th congressional district in 2018, write-in candidate for Florida's 6th congressional district in 2020, and candidate for Florida's 10th congressional district in 2022
Alan Grayson, former U.S. Representative from Florida's 9th congressional district (2009–2011, 2013–2017) and perennial candidate

I know which description is more concise and more accurate. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 04:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disagree. Because of the pejorative connotation associated with the term "perennial" or "frequent" candidate, we should only call someone this if reliable sources do, not based on our own interpretation (WP:OR). Curbon7 (talk) 07:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

At its core, this is both a WP:BLP and WP:OR issue. Curbon7 (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic