This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
2024 IHC judges' letter is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Latest comment: 17 days ago7 comments2 people in discussion
The article covers the most recent significant political developments, a testament to the effort invested in its creation. However, it prompts the question: Would a similar scenario 25 years ago been deemed as "high important"? Additionally, it's possible that the ongoing nature of the piece might make assigning it a qualitative class B premature. @SaqibCrosji (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done. Perspective matters in assessing importance for WP Pak. Will help contributing to the article. Crosji (talk) 09:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'd love for you to join in.. It's such a critical and hot topic, yet surprisingly untouched by anyone. I wonder why that is as well. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Crosji: Why did you tagged "citation needed"? The references were cited inline. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 10:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Saqib I presume the quotation marks denote a specific text. However, in the initial instance, it's ambiguous which reference is intended. In the latter case, I located it and rephrased it to eliminate the need for quotation. Hope you can clarify it. Crosji (talk) 12:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
