This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on February 11, 2020. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In 2021, many unmarked gravesites from residential schools were discovered. Except none of that was true.
I'll give links to the debunking article in question:[1]
Apparently, this started as a mistaken story about a "mass grave" of 215 children being discovered, reported by The New York Times (link to the original New York Times story:[2]). This snowballed into a story about the discovery of many unmarked graves of residential Indian schoolchildren being secretly murdered by catholic priests, once several media outlets began reporting on it - every time not fact checking. This spiral and outrage became so huge it eventually led to the burning of many churches and books, the removal of statues, to Justin Trudeau taking a knee at a public cemetery and to an Inuit women being appointed the governor-general.
What happened last summer what quite intense and had a lot of fallout. It should be talked about. However, the fact that this was a small story which spiraled out of control by many media outlets reporting on each other without fact checking, all the way into a story about Catholic priests having supposedly killed thousands of Native American children in secret should be mentioned. Some of the "discoveries" cited in this list are still being stated as if it were fact, for example. I'm not sure how it should be addressed. Maybe add a sentence after stating it was fake? Maybe remove a few if that specific "discovery" did not have that much impact? I would like other users to discuss on how to handle this. 7288P (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
