Talk:2021 St. Charles Bend strike

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 St. Charles Bend strike/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 17:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I'll be taking a look at this article! Any section marked with a   Working tag means that I haven't finished combing over that area yet, but feel free to start making changes as soon as you see them! — GhostRiver 17:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede edit

  • "The background of the strike began in 2019, when the workers" → "The strike was precipitated when, in 2019, the workers"
    • Done.
  • "Federal mediator" → "federal mediator"
    • Done.
  • "while both sides continue" → "while both sides continued"
    • Done.
  • "with workers returning to the hospital" → "and workers returned to the hospital."
    • Done.

Background edit

  • Delink hospital
    • Done.
  • ""30,000 square miles of Oregon."" → ""30,000 square miles of Oregon"." per MOS:LQ
    • Done.
  • "Union members claimed" → "Union members also claimed"
    • Done.
  • "20%" → "20 percent" per MOS:PERCENT
    • Done.
  • "94" → "94 percent" per MOS:PERCENT
    • Done.
  • "The notice said the strike was to commence ten days from then, giving a tentative start date as March 4." → "The notice said that the strike would begin ten days thereafter, which would tentatively place the start date at March 4."
    • Done.
  • ""issue can be resolved."" → ""issue can be resolved"." per MOS:LQ
    • Done.
  • "the day before the start of the strike" → "the day before the strike was due to begin" (both are true, but from a logical movement perspective of the article)
    • Done.
  • "not willing to cancel the strike" → "rather than a cancellation"
    • Done.

Course of the strike edit

  • ""On strike against unfair labor practices."" → "On strike against unfair labor practices"." per MOS:LQ
    • Done.
  • "district attorney" → "District Attorney" (an elected title along the lines of Senator or State Representative)
    • Done.
  • Specify that the hectic work environment was caused by these replacement workers being unfamiliar with the systems used onsite
    • Done.
  • "Federal mediator" → "federal mediator"
    • Done.
  • Pipe "Zoom" to Zoom (software)
    • Done.
  • "though the request was rejected" → "a request which was rejected"
    • Done.
  • "11 days after its beginning" → "11 days after it began."
    • Done.

Aftermath edit

  • "25%" → "25 percent" per MOS:PERCENT
    • Done.
  • "claimed that the pay"
    • Done
  • "11%" → "11 percent" per MOS:PERCENT
    • Done.

References edit

  • No issues with reference format

General comments edit

  • No pictures are used in the article, thus picture criteria are not applicable
  • No issues with stability in edit history
  • Earwig score is a little high at 21.3%, but that's mostly due to proper nouns and attributed direct quotes

Putting on hold for now. Ping me if you have any questions. — GhostRiver 17:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

GhostRiver, just wanted to ping you and say that I made some edits to address the points you raised in this GA review. Thank you for initiating the review, and if there are any further comments, questions, or concerns, please reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
All good on my end, passing now! — GhostRiver 20:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply