Talk:2021 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game/GA1

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 17:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this within a week. -Riley1012 (talk) 17:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

1. Well-written

  • "They were awarded an at-large bid to the NCAA tournament, and received the No. 1 seed in the South Regional." remove the comma
  • "The pre-game and post-game shows included analysis by Greg Gumbel, Clark Kellogg, Kenny Smith, and Charles Barkley, Seth Davis, and Jim Jackson" This could be re-written into two sentences by separating the analysts for the pre-game and post-game shows (ex: The pre-game show included analysis by Greg...., and the post-game show included Charles...")

2. Verifiable

  • Is there a source for note a?
  • References that need to be archived to a 2021 capture: 2, 6, 17
  • "This was the second consecutive championship game where both teams were playing for their programs' first NCAA title." Source?
  • "Baylor also became the first team from the state of Texas to win the national championship since Texas Western in 1966." Source?
  • Source for starting lineups?

Ref layout is good and copyvio check looks good.

3. Broad

  • Could the Media section be expanded by adding viewing number information?

Article is focused

4. Neutral
Article is neutral in its coverage

5. Stable
Article is stable

6. Illustrated
One photo of MOP Jared Butler is free use

-Riley1012 (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Riley1012: I think this is ready for another look! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@PCN02WPS: Okay, the changes look good to me! -Riley1012 (talk) 23:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply