Talk:COVID-19 community quarantines in the Philippines
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 community quarantines in the Philippines article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Requested move 25 April 2020 edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. BD2412 T 00:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
2020 Philippine community quarantines → Philippine local government response to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic – The huge content from the main article (that was proposed to be summarized due to the "excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience") could work better with this title while complying to the United States' and India's local government responses to the pandemic, and tackling the various community quarantines which I presume, are subject to change in the near future. A better name could be decided later on. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Support per reason above. The article itself has been tagged "...is missing information about enhanced community quarantine measures by locality. Please expand the article to include this information.," which I presume can also be remedied if the title is renamed this way. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose. The WP:COMMONNAME is still community quarantines, which has gone from plain CQ to ECQ (enhanced) and now GCQ (general). Who knows what other CQ comes next. As far as individual local government responses to the pandemic in PH, they all revolve around this national government-imposed community quarantines, thats all there is to it.--RioHondo (talk) 17:24, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose: Same as RioHondo, CQ/ECQ/GCQ are the common names. Renaming this to harmonize this with articles for preventive measures on other countries may be fine, but better keep the status quo. Issue on excessive content a few are interested on can be fixed by trimming bits of this. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.