Talk:2016 Liège–Bastogne–Liège

2016 Liège–Bastogne–Liège was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 22, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 Liège–Bastogne–Liège/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 08:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I will review this as part of the GAN Backlog Drive. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unlike other articles of this editor, the cited roadbook is not given in the references. Since I was unable to retrieve it myself, I am unable to check it, therefore it pains me to say that I will need to fail this review. All other problems I have found with this article have been resolved by me. If anyone else is able to find the roadbook, feel free to add it and enter this article for GA again. Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 Liège–Bastogne–Liège. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160503104025/http://www.cyclingnews.com/liege-bastogne-liege/results/ to http://www.cyclingnews.com/liege-bastogne-liege/results/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic