Talk:2016 League1 Ontario season

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Canada: Ontario / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Pre-Season Pep Talk edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just a quick word about what I think works best in terms of updating this page:

Last year, I updated the standings & stats after every weekend set of matches. I feel this was a good balance in terms of workload vs accuracy - I don't imagine too many people check this page regularly, so it's not necessary to update it daily.
The only exception to the above was the cup, which I did within a day or two of the match because it's kind of a special thing.
I'd recommend waiting until week 3 or so before adding goalscoring stats, simply because it won't mean all that much before then. Wiki guidelines state that we should have (at a minimum) a list of the top 10 goalscorers. With the extra stats on the website this year, I think we should be able to go beyond that.
If anyone else wants to update this more frequently, you're (obviously) free to do so, but I don't personally think it's of value.
The women's section still looks ugly, though I haven't been able to find a better setup. If anyone can do better, feel free to edit.

-Gopherbashi (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply