Talk:2013–14 Sunderland A.F.C. season
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
League table edit
Hi.
We had/have a recent discussion at The Village Pump (feel free to join) where the editors modified the sandbox of {{2013–14 Premier League table/sandbox}} to have a truncated transclusion of the table for use on the pages for the current season of all the teams. This has also been informed at WT:FOOTY to get people to join the discussion at village pump. This template is then supposed to be used on all of the season articles. QED237 (talk) 12:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Fixtures edit
We should not list or mention more than one fixture according to copywright laws. This could be read for instance here and has been mentioned on WT:FOOTY at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 82#La Liga fixtures copyright? recently. You can also look at the bottom at other clubs season articles which have a note to not list fixtures. QED237 (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- I can see why people are suspicious of the Premier League's right to license their fixtures when there have been several court cases regarding this matter. Plus Wikipedia abides by US law, which I believe does not allow for sporting schedules to be copyrighted. However, Football DataCo, the company that licenses the fixtures for the Premier League, Football League and Scottish leagues in the UK, would be well within their rights to take Wikipedia to court over the overuse of fixtures here. We are a free encyclopaedia, which means we cannot afford to pay for the license; it also means we definitely cannot afford to pay legal fees if Football DataCo decides to sue us over the use of the fixtures. If you want Wikipedia to be sued and then have to be taken down over non-payment of legal fees, be my guest and post the fixtures, but I advise against it. – PeeJay 17:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2013–14 Sunderland A.F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329014141/http://www.premierleague.com:80/page/LeagueTable/ to http://www.premierleague.com/page/LeagueTable
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)