Talk:2011 French Open – Men's singles

please use the proper notation

Wiki tennis policy is to include BOTH scores of the tiebreak. Please conform to policy when updating. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean that a score of 7–6(3) should be written as 7⁷ and 6³? Because all of the tennis results pages that I've seen in the past list results like 7–6(3) as 7 and 6³. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 23:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Tennis policy is not to include both scores of the tiebreak. it wasn't done in any tournament of this year and of past seasons. i can't see why add the winning score now. It's not useful and uncorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.81.171.98 (talk) 19:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect...it is against wiki consensus WP:TENSCR to do otherwise. Both scores must be present and no tiebreak scores in prose. It is done all over the place it's just that many articles have not been corrected. And I believe on June 1st there is going to be a wikipedia tennis drive to correct tiebreaks in as many old articles as possible. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 French Open – Men's Singles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160525201236/http://www.rolandgarros.com/en_FR/scores/draws/ms/msdraw.pdf to http://www.rolandgarros.com/en_FR/scores/draws/ms/msdraw.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)