vaporwave and future funk edit

There needs to be something mentioning vaporwave and future funk that goes something like this:

Vaporwave is both a music genre and art movement that began in the early 2010s that genres like lounge music, elevator music, smooth jazz, ambient, ‘80s dance-pop and R&B, and the more recent chillwave with a nostalgic fascination for retro cultural aesthetics, videogames, technology, and postmodern Japanese culture and advertising. Vaporwave often parodies, critiques, and satires consumer capitalism and technocapitalism. Vaporwave’s visual style is commonly called "aesthetics" (often stylized as "A E S T H E T I C S").

Future funk emerged as an upbeat offshoot of vaporwave, combining vaporwave with J-pop, French house, funk, synth-funk, disco, and nu-disco. Anime is often used in future funk’s aesthetics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IsaacBonewits (talkcontribs) 02:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Genre and Subgenre Popularity edit

I have a question: Are the genres and subgenres listed from most popular to least popular? If not, I believe somebody should put them in order. WikipediaWanderer (talk) 00:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Early posts edit

I revived this article because a large amount of 2010s music has now been made. DriveMySol (talk) 07:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

However, this article should be small until we get to say, mid 2011. DriveMySol (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC) It's currently 2020...Reply

General Overview edit

The general overview talks about 2000s music more than it talks about 2010s music. Many music fads in the 2000s are not that popular in the 2010s, with an exception with a few fads from the year 2000 such as dance music, autotune, and teen pop. The 2010s are a totally different era than the 2000s, which is a more dirtier, sleazier continuation of the 1990s. I suggest that you research about the current trends in music from 2009 to the present. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.254.184 (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rock Music edit

There is a lot of focus with just the pop music. I think there should be some focus on some trends of Rock Music of the 2010s. You can't forget rock. Rock music is not dead and all emo at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.251.178.141 (talk) 18:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rock music is not dead, it currently holds the most album sales, it still very popular and mainstream, there are many rock bands on the "Billboard 200" chart in 2011, and there's no way to forget metalcore emergence, heavy metal and hard rock re-emergence, "new wave" rock music and even a "grunge revival" that's happening on the underground scene. There are even rock bands on the Hot 100 chart, Foo Fighters, Coldplay, Seether, Blink-182, Foster the People, Hot Chelle Rae, Maroon 5 and OneRepublic. Rock is far away from dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.213.18.93 (talk) 18:42, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I feel like grunge is making a small comeback with the small Nirvana reunion, Alice in Chains reunion, Stone Temple Pilots reunion, Soundgarden reunion, etc etc. --Anon (talk) 01:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • The indie music section needs to be expanded more. It's way too small for the most popular genre of the decade. Indie rock does not mean just Alt-J and Cage the Elephant. Haha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eatyrveggies (talkcontribs) 21:31, 3 May 2015‎ (UTC)Reply

Okay, whoever is the idiot that keeps putting the 1975 or Alt-J or Of Monsters and Men in the Indie Music section is a complete imbecile. They are NOT FROM AMERICA. Look at a map because Iceland (Where Of Monsters and Men are FROM ICELAND) is NOT in America. and the 1975 ARE FROM ENGLAND. PSA: THESE ARE NOT IN AMERICA. THESE ARE COUNTRIES. AMERICA IS A COUNTRY IN NORTH AMERICA, ENGLAND AND ICELAND ARE NOT. There are in Europe, which is another continent (major, major sarcasm). Also, Linkin Park and Coldplay are not "alternative", you guys. "Indie" is an economic term usually meaning a band is signed to a smaller label or at least a band signed to a major that fits the indie aesthetic but Coldplay and Linkin Park are as corporate as it gets, they were NEVER ALTERNATIVE. At least get the aesthetic right. SMH. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theatheistgerm (talkcontribs) 03:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sections which need to be expanded edit

Because there still arn't enough notable trends in each one of the popular genres popular (we're only half a year into the 2010s) I suggest that we incorporate information about the leading artists/singles in the charts so far - this information would be replaced in future with a more general review which would include tthe most prominent trends in each genre. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 22:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hip-Hop edit

Where is this information about hip-hop coming from? Any credible source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.74.75 (talk) 02:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wow... this is pretty out of date now. Hip Hop* is in NO WAY as popular as it was in the 2000s. Who exactly wrote that paragraph? Where do you live in 2012 that Hip Hop isn't completely off the top 10 in your radio market? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.185.210 (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Then do something about it. This whole article is one big mess of an opinion piece at this point, it needs all the rewriting, and sources, it can get... Sergecross73 msg me 13:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • exception: MUMBLE RAP

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:Requested moves which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 22:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pop edit

I think Glee should be mentioned somewhere. From the Glee discography Wikipedia page: "The cast holds the record for most charted songs by an act in the 53-year history of the Billboard Hot 100, with 207 appearances as of October 2013.[9] Two singles, "Teenage Dream" and "Loser Like Me", charted in the top ten in the US and Canada, and both were certified gold in the US. The cast has also put 51 singles in the top 40 on the Billboard Hot 100, and are on top of The Beatles as of October 2013, behind only Lil Wayne with 64, Elton John with 57 and Elvis Presley with 80." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potie15 (talkcontribs) 22:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


"Rather than buying music people opted to go and watch bands and socialise, spending their money on merchandise and amphetamines. This is an ongoing and longstanding trend."

Without some solid evidence to back it up, this claim seems very anecdotal and un-encyclopedic. Can this be backed up with figures showing decreased music sales and increased concert attendance? Can we also show increased merchandise sales and amphetamine usage? Finally, can it be shown that the people buying more amphetamines are the same people who used to buy music? This is a big (and difficult) claim to prove.
I think a better way of phrasing this would be to have a section (or even a new article) discussing the relationship between particular genres of music and types of drugs (for example, trance and MDMA). Considering that the synergy of music and drugs is a HUGE part of many peoples' lives across many cultures, I think it deserves more than a judgmental, one-line oversimplification. We have Drugs and sex and Drugs and prostitution, so why not Drugs and music?--James Monroe (talk) 16:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

K-Pop edit

A bit surprised nothing's been mentioned about the continued rise in popularity or the failed/semi-successful attempts to break into American mainstream. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.70.99.173 (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree, especially with Gang-nam style rising to popularity K-Pop needs to be mentioned Anon (talk) 22:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Latinamerican music edit

I don't understand how Nicki Minaj a trinidarian born american artist, thinking that Trinidad and Tobago is not even a latin country, is the most representative artist of Latin America in the 2010s. As often occurs, latinamerican artist who have succeed in the United States are taken as 'One of the most succesful Latin american artist', when most of them have little to do with latinamerican culture, or are not even popular in the region. Wikipedia should have a realistic worldwide point of view, or just leave it empty. --Tommy The Wise (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Electronic Music edit

First off, can "Flume" be included in this section as he has had influence from 2012 onwards in an emerging sub-genre of music future beats/Australian sound

Define this statement edit

"vocally lower-key artists"

I believe this means (for women) contralto singers. Is this right?? Georgia guy (talk) 15:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2010s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC) talk:24.186.126.78|talk]]) 05:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

confusing sentence edit

"Hip hop acts that have or never charted below the top 40 on Billboard Hot 100..."

not sure what this means.

-KaJunl (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

hip hop section issues edit

There were serious issues in the hip hop section - a very poorly written paragraph about drill music without capitalization or proper grammar. I did some quick cleanup, but someone else should also take a look. I question whether the content even belongs here. Trap music itself is not featured prominently in the hip hop section, but then this subgenre called drill is? Presumably written by one person who is a Chicago drill enthusiast. -KaJunl (talk) 19:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mess edit

This article needs a clean-up, so many names nothing to do with this decade. On the other hand, there are like 20 crossover artists this decade, their wins are for R&B, Hip hop or Pop? Beyoncé, Rihanna, Justin Timberlake, Taylor Swift, Nicki Minaj, among them. It isn't clear. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2010s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Pop Rock is still popular edit

Someone should add that pop-rock was big in the 1970s and 80s as well. And pop-rock acts are still being played quite frequently on adult-contemporary stations (especially Train and One Republic).2602:306:CD9B:E9A0:E1F5:D02A:EB42:11A0 (talk) 03:12, 3 February 2019 (UTC)ESReply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply