Talk:2010 G20 Toronto summit/GA3

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Tenmei in topic Infobox

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Plarem (User | talk | contribs)   20:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Plarem (User | talk | contribs)   20:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Infobox edit

I concur with Eelamstylez77's edit here. --Tenmei (talk) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply