Talk:2009 Mangalore pub attack
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 Mangalore pub attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about 2009 Mangalore pub attack. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 2009 Mangalore pub attack at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Most Watched Clips On YouTube? edit
In the opening paragraph it states "The video of the incident has become one of the most watched clips on YouTube" This is wrong for a start. The second reference for this doesn't mention Youtube at all and the first reference contains a quote of a comment on the video that appears on a clip which only has around 109,000 views at the time of writing. I can't find a clip that has more views than that and it's obvious that the first reference is refering to that one. I will remove it unless anyone has any objections. --Kurushi (talk) 12:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Pink chaddi campaign edit
Hey! Surprised to see no one added bits about the Pink chaddi campaign! Feeling lazy to add it myself...:P --KnowledgeHegemony talk 17:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey an article alreasy exists. Pink Chaddi Campaign! Where to go! --KnowledgeHegemony talk 17:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Typo - Sri Ram Sene or Shri Ram Sena? edit
Is it Sene or Sena? All the western India newspapers called it the 'Sri Ram Sene' but the article says Shri Ram Sena. Think it needs correction, unless someone thinks I'm wrong. -- VikramPuri (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Dead link edit
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://timesnow.tv/NewsDtls.aspx?NewsID=27699
- In Hindu Taliban on 2011-03-29 07:29:13, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
- In 2009 Mangalore pub attack on 2011-06-17 17:57:08, 404 Not Found
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page edit
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.nhatky.in/no-question-of-banning-sri-ram-sena-12320421
- Triggered by
\bnhatky\.in\bon the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2009 Mangalore pub attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090907191602/http://www.compassdirect.org:80/english/country/india/2296/ to http://www.compassdirect.org/english/country/india/2296/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)