Talk:2009 Graff Diamonds robbery/Archive 1

Archive 1

Source?

The main text is identical to the article here: http://themostexpensivethings.blogspot.com/2009/09/most-expensive-robbery-graff-diamonds.html but it's not clear which was written first. Is there confidence that this is them copying WP and not the other way around? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blahaccountblah (talkcontribs) 08:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Every confidence - I wrote the largest portion of the text, over several days as details emerged/were released. The blog above has just copy/pasted my writing. Also, I wrote most of this in early August, whereas the blog item was posted sometime in September. The only edit made to this article since August was one of purely formatting, not text. Keristrasza (talk) 10:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh good. Glad to hear it. blahaccountblah (talk) 21:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Edits 8/2010

I did some heavy editing. Since the conviction of the robbers there is now a lot more information that no longer has to be prefaced by words like 'allegedly'. Everything referenced. Cheers! Meishern (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

This article is no longer a stub

Hi, I removed some of the tags regarding this article being libelous (robbers were convicted and sentenced). However this article is not a Stub. It is quite detailed now and whoever created the original article, please have it regraded. If this article is not a C at least, I would be shocked. Cheers! Meishern (talk) 18:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)