Talk:2009 Boko Haram uprising

bias

as of now this article has NO mention WHATSOEVER of the Islamist ideology of the groups causing the trouble. To cover this event properly it needs mention of that factor. --86.135.181.189 (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

It does now: "The battles began on 26 July when Boko Haram, a militant Islamist organisation," AndrewRT(Talk) 23:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

A government report on the violence eventually came out that's allowed for a bit of background to be inserted. Joe.bav (talk) 17:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

400 people now reported killed

I haven't seen anything confirming this claim by "Civil Rights Congress" but if true, this article will need to updated shortly. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/africa/07/28/nigeria.violence.deaths/index.html Menrunningpast (talk) 23:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

I see that this article was initially posted during and in the immediate aftermath of these events. There have since been a final death toll estimate of over 1,000. Joe.bav (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Article title

In my mind this article should be rather moved to "2009 Nigerian Islamic insurgency" or something like that, "religious violence" is just to vague, and as I can see it is only Islamists who has started and are activly involved in this rebellion, no other religion, only a response by government forces. -GabaG (talk) 16:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

yes, this is more a short conflict than just violence, however I would prefer 2009 Northern Nigeria rebellion--TheFEARgod (Ч) 21:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

This isn't "sectarian" violence either. Sectarian violence is where two (or more) sects fight against each other; in this case you have Boko Haram vs. the nigerian security forces plus christian civilians. There have, as yet, been no reported revenge attacks by Christians. My suggestion actually is that the entire article is just merged into Boko Haram. AndrewRT(Talk) 23:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree on the "sectarian" thing, but not on the merge. The days of bloodshed are more notable that the actual group--TheFEARgod (Ч) 09:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I suggest the article be moved to "2009 Boko Haram Uprising" since it is clearly not an example of sectarian violence. Boko Haram has since gone on to become a well-known group and a much more significant security threat, so I feel there is justification for using their name in the article title. Joe.bav (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

will do. --Johanneswilm (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

End of the conflict

There are no more reports of fighting, which means its over. Could someone put a referenced end date?

Reenem (talk)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Potato Riots which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2009 Boko Haram uprising. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1248187502404&pagename=Zone-English-News%2FNWELayout
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090812212917/http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/news/national/2009/aug/06/national-06-08-2009-01.htm to http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/news/national/2009/aug/06/national-06-08-2009-01.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C23599%2C25851473-38195%2C00.html?from=public_rss
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=102384&sectionid=351020505

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected small typo

The second paragraph says “joint tax forces,” I assume it means task forces. I’ve never edited a page before so I didn’t want to screw it up. Also I didn’t do any research on if Boko Haram is in tax trouble. I thought mentioning the typo here would be best for now. 2600:8801:3887:6C00:C449:7311:5D73:2CB9 (talk) 11:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)BuffaloRome