Good article2007 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2007 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 2007 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2013Good article nomineeListed
March 17, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Season Has Ended edit

Please put all discussion unrelated to articles on the Hurricane Wikia.
2007 TROPICAL CYCLONE SUMMARY TABLE

NAME             DATES         MAX WIND (KT)     DEATHS
-------------------------------------------------------
TS ALVIN        27-31 MAY          35                0
TS BARBARA    29 MAY-2 JUN         45                0
TD THREE-E      11-12 JUN          30                0  
TD FOUR-E        9-11 JUL          30                0 
TD FIVE-E       14-15 JUL          30                0
H COSME         14-23 JUL          65                0
TS DALILA       22-27 JUL          50                0
TS ERICK      31 JUL- 2 AUG        35                0
H FLOSSIE        8-16 AUG         120                0
TS GIL         29 AUG-2 SEP        40                0
H HENRIETTE    30 AUG-6 SEP        75                9
TS THIRTEEN-E   19-20 SEP          30                0
H IVO           18-23 SEP          70                0
TS JULIETTE    29 SEP-2 OCT        50                0
TS KIKO         15-23 OCT          60                0
-------------------------------------------------------  

Declaring storms inactive edit

The NHC issued Advisory 22 for Tropical Storm 22 at 2 pm PDT, and as I was updating the infobox (minutes after 2 pm PDT), some folks were declaring the storm inactive. At 2 pm PDT the NHC was still referring to it as a Tropical Depression ("THE DEPRESSION IS MOVING SLOWLY TOWARD THE EAST NEAR 5 MPH AND THIS GENERAL MOTION IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS. ON THIS TRACK...THE REMNANT LOW OF IVO SHOULD PASS SOUTH OF THE EXTREME SOUTHERN TIP OF THE BAJA CALIFORNIA PENINSULA TONIGHT OR EARLY MONDAY."), but not 5 minutes later we now consider it to already be a remnant low? Am I crazy, or shouldn't any storm that's on the NHC Active Storms page (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/nhc_storms.shtml) be considered active? We're not even going to update Advisory 22? What's the big rush to declare storms inactive? DOSGuy 22:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

If we keep it active until it is gone from the NHC page there will be "As of 2pm PDT September 23 Tropical Depression Ivo was located..." for another 48 hours. There will be no more advisories so it is no longer active. ---CWY2190TC 23:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
We never had this problem before (not sure what we did) but I think it's a good idea to keep up the small infobox in the storm section until NHC takes it off. The NHC takes it off 24 hours after last advisory, so 24 hours of "As of 2pm PDT..." is not a problem, IMO. However, I do not think that it should be listed as active in the seasonal infobox. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't see a problem with having it up for 24 hours after the final advisory. Information that is only 24 hours old is still timely, and the remnant of this particular storm is still going pass over the Baja California peninsula. I think we should take a storm down when the NHC does. They probably have a reason for leaving them up. DOSGuy 02:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, NRL monitors all systems for regeneration, which is why storms get left on that site for a few days. NRL uses NHC data with NHC's consent, but it's not official; the name is no longer active or in use when the last advisory is issued, except for systems which end up getting HPC advisories. --Coredesat 02:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
That's interesting. At any rate, my point is that rather than have the sentence "As of 2pm PDT September 23 Tropical Depression Ivo was located..." up for 24 hours, we chose not to post it at all. If the NHC issues an advisory, it seems to me that there was a reason, and we should post it for at least a few hours. I didn't realize that we had been failing to post the final advisory for storms up until now. I think if the NHC posts an advisory, so should we. When they take it down, so can we. I don't think there's a big rush to clear the board. DOSGuy 02:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assesment edit

I would recommend that this page gets put up for a GA Nomination when the final 2 TCRs are out from the NHC i have also recomended this for the atlantic page Jason Rees (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ivo Tcr edit

Ivo we are now just waiting for Flossie and the track maps Jason Rees (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Flossie TCR edit

[1] --Ajm81 06:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Map edit

The official map is out now. [2] --Ajm81 22:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

All right, let's upload it and put it in the template. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 23:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
It has a bad file name not according to the naming conventions for those maps. --213.155.231.26 (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

TD4E and TD5E edit

These two storms have the same picture and track map. Could someone fix this? bob rulz (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixed it. -Ramisses (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dead link edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 2 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 3 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 4 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 5 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 6 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 7 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 8 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 9 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 10 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 11 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 12 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 13 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 14 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 15 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 16 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 17 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 18 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 19 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 20 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 Pacific hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 03:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • "In terms of the Accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) index, 2007, at the time, featured the second-lowest value since reliable records began in 1971." - a bit poorly written. So is this no longer the 2nd lowest?
    • Right. 2010 bumped it to 3rd place. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
      • In that case, why not something like, "At the time, 2007 featured the second-lowest value of the Accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) index since reliable records began in 1971." It helps get rid of a few commas. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Instead of keeping on saying "2007 USD", why not add a note saying "All damage totals are in 2007 USD unless otherwise stated"?
  • "Finally, in mid-October, Tropical Storm Kiko passed just offshore the coastline of southwestern Mexico; though no deaths were reported on the Mexico mainland, the storm capsized a ship with 30 people on board. A total of 24 were killed." - why finally? Also, I'd split after the semicolon, and merge in the last bit.
  • "Factors attributing to the forecasts of both included the overall reduction in activity as a result of the ongoing multi-decadal signal and a high likelihood of ENSO-Neutral or La Niña conditions." - eek. Try rewording to something simpler.
  • "Total tropical cyclone activity totaled" - redundancy?
  • "The main contributing factor to below-average activity was presumably much above-average wind shear across the Pacific basin" - presumably?
  • "In May 2007, two tropical storms – Alvin and Barbara – developed, marking at the time the third such instance since official records began in 1949" - you should probably clarify a bit more that this refers to two storms developing in May, not just two in a month in general.
  • "can be attributed to a tropical wave that crossed Dakar " - you might want to clarify Africa here. (maybe, "in western Africa"?)
  • "where shower and thunderstorm activity gradually began to increase and coalesce over a well-defined center of circulation" - this could be shorter/simpler.
  • You only mention Alvin once by name in its section. Any reason?
  • Why don't you mention when Alvin's remnant low dissipated? Ditto 3E, 4E, Dalila, Gil, and Ivo
  • When you do PDF's, it should just say [format=PDF]. No need for the dot before PDF
  • Link Puerto Escondido in Barbara's section, and say what country
  • "Within an environment of weak steering currents, the satellite appearance " - so the satellite appearance was in an environment of weak steering currents? Watch for dangling participles! You do something similar with Dalilia - "After attaining its peak intensity... a track", as well as Ivo - "After attaining its peak intensity... increasing westerly wind shear"
  • When did Barbara become a TS?
  • "Drifting northeast, the storm maintained this intensity until landfall just northwest of the Mexico-Guatemala border at 1300 UTC the following day. Rapid weakening ensued thereafter, with the system weakening to a tropical depression at 1800 UTC. The low-level circulation dissipated six hours later, marking the dissipation of Barbara." - a date somewhere in here would be nice.
  • "Heavy rainfall exceeding 4 in (100 mm) caused many rivers to swell." - where?
  • "significant flooding killed a total of four." --> "significant flooding killed four people." No need for "a total of"
  • "Gusts peaked out at 58 mph (85 km/h)" - the "out" is unnecessary
  • "Puerto Madero" - country?
  • As a general note, try not using "shower and thunderstorm activity" too often, when "convection" is equally valid (and three words fewer).
  • "Three-E" - try avoid using this as a name. Just say "the depression" when referring to it on its own.
  • What are the "ten colonies" you speak of in Dalila's section?
  • "with at least 15 in (380 km)" - think you mean mm, but just wanna check
  • Why say "wood-built structures" when "wooden structures" is much more natural?
  • Feels weird for Erick's section to be so short.
  • Any more impact for Flossie? Also, some location inferences would be good for the storm.
  • " the center passed a few tens of miles offshore" - wha?
  • "where heavy rains led to rock and" - and roll?
  • "and killed four, two of which off the coast" - people aren't objects. Use "whom" instead of "which"
  • Consider merging Ivo.
  • "Associated deep convection dissipated later that day as Ivo turned westward" - the track suggests eastward
  • Where does the source say " nine were never found and presumed dead"?
  • "The following names were used for tropical storms that formed in the northeast Pacific Ocean in 2007. The names not retired from this list were used again in the 2013 season." - since no names were retired, I think the text needs adjustments
  • Any reason you list the CPHC names? None were used.
  • Why is Alvin listed as "0" deaths, and others are listed as "none", in the season effects table?

All in all, decent article, just a lot of small mistakes that can be easily fixed. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and I checked an earlier version of the article, and it appears you're missing impact for Gil. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2007 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2007 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Erick 2007 listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Erick 2007. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Hurricane Cosme (2007) into 2007 Pacific hurricane season edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Fails WP:NWX since the only impact was minimal flooding, winds, and surf. There wasn't any meteorological reasoning for the article existing either. Noah, AATalk 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Merge - content can be included in the season article easily. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Merge: as stated before, Cosme was not notable in any way, shape, or form ''Flux55'' (talk) 02:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

UTC)

  • Merge - the storm's history is unremarkable and its impact minimal. Also, its story can easily fit into the season article. Drdpw (talk) 19:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.