Talk:2006 Santa Cruz Measure K
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2006 Santa Cruz Measure K article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
2014 Business Tax edit
In November 2014, a new business tax was added to vote on with the same letter, effectively doubling the taxes on this business type. Which unlike the other tax, it wasn't collected by the state, it was simply a tax on business gross receipts. 174.62.68.53 (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Citation 5 edit
Citing an biased pamphlet is not really a citation... Nor did it really say which law it would refuse to uphold. 174.62.68.53 (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Measure K. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120191944/http://www.votescount.com/nov06/meak.pdf to http://www.votescount.com/nov06/meak.pdf/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)