Talk:2006 G20 ministerial meeting

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

dunno how to resize pics, they need to be though...Viva43 05:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone know what the 19 countries and the EU will talk about during the summit? Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 14:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

--

This article repeats the claims made by Treasurer Peter Costello that protestors threw urine-filled balloons. There's actually no evidence that this happened (has it ever happened at an Australian protest) and the Victorian Police themselves have said that they weren't aware of any "urine-throwing". Why begs the questions - where did Costello get this unverified information from and why hasn't the story been corrected by media outlets?

Saudi Arabia edit

If the countries listed are truely speaking at the G20 summit, why is Saudi Arabia not shaded on the map of nations attending? Epstein.Mark 20:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Major Point Left Out edit

I think that the article is rather biased; there has been much discussion in the media of the lack of police action, based on instructions from Chief Police Commissioner Christine Nixon. It has been quite clear that the behaviour of police was relatively weak compared to the damage the protestors wreaked; vans attacked, police officers being hosed, etc. I think this should definately have a heavier weighting in the article.

some references:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/g20-summit-ends-as-protests-fizzle-out/2006/11/19/1163871253994.html?from=rss

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/column_our_cops_go_girly/

Katie 11:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. -- Chuq 11:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Referencing edit

Over the last few days I have been adding content and references to this article. References have been boosted from 5 to 27. I think the article is pretty well referenced now, so deleted the references tag that has been on the article since December 2006. The major content added included the discussions and outcome of the G20 meeting in a new section. I have also added content to Protests including on Operation Salver to bring the article up to date.Takver 02:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


is this relevant? edit

i'm not sure if this is relevant in encyclopaedic content, but why has the 'chasers boys' breach of security not been mentioned? ~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.171.196.37 (talk) 11:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply




Fair use rationale for Image:G20 Melbourne meeting room.jpg edit

 

Image:G20 Melbourne meeting room.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article name change edit

Would anyone object naming the article about the G20 summit in Mebourne "2006 Melbourne G20 ministerial meeting".--Briaboru (talk) 03:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dead link edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 2 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 3 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 4 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 5 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 6 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 7 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 8 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 9 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 10 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 11 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 12 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/g20-summit-video/2006/11/20/
    Triggered by \bdailyreckoning\.(?:com|org|co\.uk)\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 03:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 G20 ministerial meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2006 G20 ministerial meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply